In our special education cases, we often see that the description of a student’s present level of performance in the IEP is worded in general and vague language. Because of this, parents rightly complain that the IEP meetings are frustrating because there is no clear basis upon which to measure their child’s progress. School personnel are making performance assessments based on anecdotal reports of teachers rather than clear measurable data that reflect the student’s current status. If there is no baseline data, measuring a child’s progress becomes impossible and fuels disputes between parents and educators when the need for services or placement becomes a contested issue in IEP meetings.
The present level of performance section of the IEP must be a detailed and unique description for a particular student. This section must include a baseline description of the child’s present level of actual performance which is supported by real, current and measurable data. It is this baseline that drives realistic and measurable goals in an IEP. Failure to have a meaningful baseline will lead to a legally flawed IEP and problems down the road. We need to get this right the first time.